<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple tries to defend its App Store to the FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juggleware.com/blog/2009/08/apple-tries-to-defend-its-app-store-to-the-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juggleware.com/blog/2009/08/apple-tries-to-defend-its-app-store-to-the-fcc/</link>
	<description>news and random thoughts from your friendly neighborhood independent developers at juggleware, llc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.juggleware.com/blog/2009/08/apple-tries-to-defend-its-app-store-to-the-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juggleware.com/blog/?p=136#comment-132</guid>
		<description>That &quot;free market machine&quot; is exactly what enables companies to create products like the one you&#039;re trying to leverage for political reasons.  The first amendment has nothing to do with a retailer&#039;s right to choose what they sell. You can&#039;t force a store to stock your product. That would be a nightmare.

I understand where you&#039;re coming from, but you&#039;ll get a lot farther exercising your freedom than trying to get others (which includes corporations) to stop exercising theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8220;free market machine&#8221; is exactly what enables companies to create products like the one you&#8217;re trying to leverage for political reasons.  The first amendment has nothing to do with a retailer&#8217;s right to choose what they sell. You can&#8217;t force a store to stock your product. That would be a nightmare.</p>
<p>I understand where you&#8217;re coming from, but you&#8217;ll get a lot farther exercising your freedom than trying to get others (which includes corporations) to stop exercising theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://www.juggleware.com/blog/2009/08/apple-tries-to-defend-its-app-store-to-the-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juggleware.com/blog/?p=136#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Another app recently censored was Ninjawords— an English dictionary. Even though it had already been given a 17+ rating, it was deemed &quot;offensive&quot; bcecause users could type in words like &quot;fuck&quot; and it would give you the definition from wiktionary.com.

http://daringfireball.net/2009/08/ninjawords

This is possibly the stupidest, worst rejection I know of to date. To be consistent, Apple will now have to censor Safari for letting you search google for the same word.  But we all know Apple&#039;s not going to be consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another app recently censored was Ninjawords— an English dictionary. Even though it had already been given a 17+ rating, it was deemed &#8220;offensive&#8221; bcecause users could type in words like &#8220;fuck&#8221; and it would give you the definition from wiktionary.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/08/ninjawords" rel="nofollow">http://daringfireball.net/2009/08/ninjawords</a></p>
<p>This is possibly the stupidest, worst rejection I know of to date. To be consistent, Apple will now have to censor Safari for letting you search google for the same word.  But we all know Apple&#8217;s not going to be consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
